Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Yards, Velez Garcia-Nieto A good, Isla-Tejera B
ninety days) involving the last browse day and full book time. With this specific suggestions, periodicals should think about asking for people away from SRs so you’re able to upgrade its literature browse through to the acceptance of your own SRs. SR users also needs to figure out the full time slowdown involving the history research go out of your product reviews with the intention that evidence was up-to-big date to possess energetic systematic decision-and come up with.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Clinical analysis during the health care an useful guide. Inside. Cambridge: Cambridge School Push,; 2001: step one online resource (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Part 24: having fun with clinical feedback and you can documents off ongoing examples to have medical and moral demo design, keeping track of, and you will reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Systematic studies in healthcare : meta-research within the perspective. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj-new jersey, Jones DR. Research synthesis since the the answer to significantly more defined and you can productive browse. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Was systematic studies right up-to-date during the time of guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty-six.
Palese A great, Coletti S, Dante A. Guide abilities among higher impact grounds breastfeeding periodicals in ’09: a beneficial retrospective analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most of clinical critiques composed into the high-perception journals failed to check in brand new standards: a good meta-epidemiological data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H. The methodological quality of logical feedback typed inside the large-impression nursing periodicals: a review of the brand new literary works. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Teaching tools inside the research centered routine: research off recyclable training things (RLOs) to own understanding meta-research. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Bj, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is actually an established and appropriate measurement product to assess the newest methodological top-notch scientific reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Yards, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic An excellent, Jeric Yards, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Meters, Poklepovic Pericic T, ainsi que al. Methodological and revealing quality of scientific ratings authored regarding the higher ranking guides in the area of aches. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The quality of clinical product reviews at your fingertips surgery: an analysis having fun with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Virtual assistant, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR review of one’s methodological top-notch logical ratings out-of oral medical care treatments published on log regarding used dental technology (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):440seven.
Medical ratings and you will meta-analyses on the psoriasis: part off investment sources, argument of interest and you can bibliometric indices as predictors away from methodological quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163349.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Admission classics during the obstetrics and you will gynecology: the new 100 usually quoted log stuff over the last 50 many years. Are J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e17.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Shipments and you will epidemiological attributes from blogged personal diligent analysis meta-analyses. PLoS You to definitely. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Acceptance away from PRISMA statement and you can top-notch clinical critiques and you will meta-analyses had written for the breastfeeding publications: a mix-sectional study. BMJ Discover. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Bj, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Meters, Andersson Letter, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A great, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Additional recognition out-of a dimension device to fransД±z arkadaЕџlД±k siteleri evaluate scientific feedback (AMSTAR). PLoS You to. 2007;2(12):e1350.
Leave a Reply